Another story about Google

The world is in uproar over the Google “Manifesto” written by now ex-Google employee, James Damore. And when I say the world is in uproar, I really mean leftist institutions and the mainstream media, all of which clearly did not read the memo before lambasting the creator as anti-diversity, and more so, anti-woman. If you haven’t had the chance to read the memo for yourself, please do. Any rational person will quickly see the psychosis of the left before leaving the first page. As a contextual side note, I hate to use the term “left” or “right” as it often sells either group short, or is too inclusive, but sometimes I find there to be a lack of a better word and therefore stick with the norm for the sake of ease of read.
This brief missive is not about the contents of the manifesto, but about the fact that this employee was used as an example of what happens to dissenting points of views in today’s workplace, nay, society. In today’s world, science doesn’t equate with truth, (at least if you read anything the Slate puts out) and anything that offends someone is deemed offensive and should be banned and the offender degraded to the lowest rungs of society, even if what was said/done is not offensive in purpose or intent, (yes, there is a difference).
As American citizens, the first amendment applies to us all. We accept that there can be consequences to free speech, and Google can fire someone for exercising their right to freedom of speech if they don’t like it, (maybe: CA is an at-will state, but if there proves to be discrimination involved in the decision to fire, we are talking another story). This is a larger issue of people in positions of control using their power to silence dissenting views. This is what happened to James Damore. Every American should be up in arms about this, and very concerned. Not only did Google move to make an example of what would happen if you don’t drink the Kool-Aid, but the mainstream media moved to put him out for public consumption, grossly distorted what was written, and provided no context. This man’s life is forever altered, over thoughts that were very eloquently and politely stated, as well as rationally and scientifically based, because it did not follow the narrative that the left, the mainstream media, and Silicon Valley are trying to desperately shove down our throats. Every American should stand in solidarity with Damore, even if they don’t agree with what he said, on principle alone, and for one reason: the first amendment applies to us all. It is a fundamental right, and you can’t pick and choose when it applies and when it does not, even if companies like Google would like to do so.

How beauteous mankind is!

 

O wonder!
How many goodly creatures are there here!
How beauteous mankind is!
O brave new world,
That has such people in’t.
— William Shakespeare, The Tempest

I’ve just finished reading Brave New World (when I say “reading’, I really mean listening to on Audible).  Written in 1931 by Aldous Huxley, Brave New World was one of the first dystopian novels, a genre that has gain much popularity in the 21st century, and for good reason.

Originally meant to be a parody of utopian novels by H.G. Wells, the novel took on a life of its own and received much praise when it was published.  It frequently makes lists of the top 100 most important books of the 20th century.

Utopian novels were popular in the early 20th century, the age when Progressivism, Communism, and Socialism were gaining acceptance.  These were the movements that would perfect society and individuals.  People saw mankind’s rapid advance toward perfection and imagined the fantastic society that would be come.  Huxley’s novel follows the trendy movements to their natural conclusion-to a drug addled, hedonistic society that had lost its soul.

Ironically, Huxley was inspired to create his dystopia after a visit to the United States.  He was not impressed by the sexual promiscuity and inward-looking nature of Americans.  Brave New World is set in London, but when its characters come to New Mexico on holiday, it is to see the savages.

Dystopian novels are meant to shock and to warn us.  After more than 80 years, Brave New World is just as relevant, if not more so.  We still suffer from the meddlers and tinkerers who continue to try to tweak society towards what they view as Utopia, where everyone is equal, happy, and wants for nothing.  Today’s college campuses would fit right in with Huxley’s Brave New World, where heretical diversity of thought is banished to far off places.  Our politicians focus on ways to make everyone equal.  I imagine that they would prefer if everyone were average, educated at a liberal arts college, and drank only Fair Trade coffee out of reusable cups.  Blandness is the Progressive’s Utopia.

Try as they might though, people don’t seem to be following their plan.  They continue to find ways to express their individuality.  The old behemoths of industry and commerce are destroyed by innovative upstarts working in their parent’s basements.  They don’t vote the way that they are expected to by the elite and the media.  They won’t believe the latest scaremongering expert telling them to change their ways or die!

“How beauteous mankind is! O brave new world, that has such people in’t.”  Keep living your beauteous lives in ways that give little regard to the opinions of meddling experts.  If we are to move toward a Utopia, it won’t be because of a government program or an inspiring leader or an academic theory of society.  It will be because you moved us closer. Individuals and families living in community, working hard, enjoying life.  That gives me reason to exclaim “O wonder!”

​In Liberty,
Ken Mandile
Senior Fellow
Worcester Tea Party

All this is what it means to be an American.

Independence Day offers us reason to celebrate and to reflect what it means to be free.  Looking to the revolutionary times of the late 18th century, we see a society where, for the first time in human history, the “common man” came to seize power from his aristocratic oppressors.  Today though, we should be looking beyond the “common man”.  We should all be uncommon.

Read more

Don’t Always Believe What You Think

“The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes.”

Winston S. Churchill

A few years ago, I saw a bumper sticker that said something that stuck in my mind firmer than the sticker was attached to the bumper.  It said ‘Don’t Always Believe What You Think’.  Philosophers call this concept “Intellectual Humility”.   This type of humility acknowledges the limitations of our knowledge.  It calls on us to challenge our own beliefs and, in doing so, places the surviving beliefs on firmer ground.

Read more

Has our government always worked this way?

“American liberals have become addicted to the courtroom, relying on judges and lawyers rather than elected leaders and the ballot box, as the primary means of effecting their social agenda on everything from gay marriage to assisted suicide to the use of vouchers for private-school education.”

This month, we are witnessing one of the most important rituals of American democracy:  the confirmation hearing of a United States Supreme Court nominee.  This process has evolved over the past few decades, particularly since the failed nomination of Judge Bork.  The contentiousness has reached embarrassing levels.  Like most modern political practices, we continue to battle over nominees much as our forefathers did, but we do it in a way that shows little regard for the character and qualifications of the nominee.

Read more

Draining The Swamp

Donald Trump’s campaign promise to “Drain the swamp” has successfully placed him in the Oval Office.  But what exactly is the swamp, and how does one go about draining it?

The commonly accepted definition of the “swamp”, and the one Trump alludes to, is the career, political elite of Washington, D.C., who are in essence tenured legislators.  This career, political class is seen as an entrenched, corrupt, blackguard of the status quo, a semi-permanent legislative body that stands between the people, their rights, and a just government.  I contend that these entrenched politicians are not in fact, THE swamp”; rather they merely reflect the dominant ideas of our culture.  I would argue that these career politicians are merely a surface layer, and the real depth of the swamp lies somewhere else.

The Democrats and Republicans are virtually united in their moral base, that is, the pinnacle of virtue for both parties is altruism, the morality which preaches the sacrifice of the individual self for “others”.  They sometimes differ on which individuals should be sacrificed, and quibble over the level of sacrifice, but they both fundamentally believe in the moral duty of being “thy brother’s keeper”.

Read more